Sincerely,







According to the Kama Sutra, males and females fit into three different categories due to the size and depth of their genitals. Are you a rabbit, bull, horse, doe, cow or she-elephant?
Man is divided into three classes, the hare man, the bull man, and the horse man, according to the size of his lingam. Woman also, according to the depth of her yoni, is either a female deer, a mare, or a female elephant. There are thus three equal unions between persons of corresponding dimensions, and there are six unequal unions, when the dimensions do not correspond, or nine in all, as the following table shows:
| EQUAL
|
UNEQUAL
|
||
| MEN
|
WOMEN
|
MEN
|
WOMEN
|
| Hare
|
Deer
|
Hare
|
Mare
|
| Bull
|
Mare
|
Hare
|
Elephant
|
| Horse
|
Elephant
|
Bull
|
Deer
|
| Bull
|
Elephant
|
||
| Horse
|
Deer
|
||
| Horse
|
Mare
|
||
In these unequal unions, when the male exceeds the female in point of size, his union with a woman who is immediately next to him in size is called high union, and is of two kinds; while his union with the woman most remote from his size is called the highest union, and is of one kind only. On the other hand, when the female exceeds the male in point of size, her union with a man immediately next to her in size is called low union, and is of two kinds; while her union with a man most remote from her in size is called the lowest union, and is of one kind only. In other words, the horse and mare, the bull and deer, form the high union, while the horse and deer form the highest union. On the female side, the elephant and bull, the mare and hare, form low unions, while the elephant has and the hare make the lowest unions. There are, then, nine kinds of union according to dimensions. Amongst all these, equal unions are the best, those of a superlative degree, i.e. the highest and the lowest, are the worst, and the rest are middling, and with them the high 1 are better than the low. There are also nine kinds of union according to the force of passion or carnal desire, as follows:
| MEN
|
WOMEN
|
MEN
|
WOMEN
|
| Small
|
Small
|
Small
|
Middling
|
| Middling
|
Middling
|
Small
|
Intense
|
| Intense
|
Intense
|
Middling
|
Small
|
| Middling
|
Intense
|
||
| Intense
|
Small
|
||
| Intense
|
Middling
|
A man is called a man of small passion whose desire at the time of sexual union is not great, whose semen is scanty, and who cannot bear the warm embraces of the female. Those who differ from this temperament are called men of middling passion, while those of intense passion are full of desire. In the same way, women are supposed to have the three degrees of feeling as specified above. Lastly, according to time there are three kinds of men and women, the short-timed, the moderate-timed, and the long-timed; and of these, as in the previous statements, there are nine kinds of union. But on this last head there is a difference of opinion about the female, which should be stated.
Auddalika says, 'Females do not emit as males do.
The males simply remove their desire, while the females, from their consciousness
of desire, feel a certain kind of pleasure, which gives them satisfaction, but
it is impossible for them to tell you what kind of pleasure they feel. The fact
from which this becomes evident is, that males, when engaged in coition, cease
of themselves after emission, and are satisfied, but it is not so with females.'
This opinion is however objected to on the grounds that, if a male be a long-timed,
the female loves him the more, but if he be short-timed, she is dissatisfied
with him. And this circumstance, some say, would prove that the female emits
also. But this opinion does not hold good, for if it takes a long time to allay
a woman's desire, and during this time she is enjoying great pleasure, it is
quite natural then that she should wish for its continuation. And on this subject
there is a verse as follows:
'By union with men the lust, desire, or passion of women is satisfied, and the
pleasure derived from the consciousness of it is called their satisfaction.'
The followers of Babhravya, however, say that the
semen of women continues to fall from the beginning of the sexual union to its
end, and it is right that it should be so, for if they had no semen there would
be no embryo. To this there is an objection. In the beginning of coition the
passion of the woman is middling, and she cannot bear the vigorous thrusts of
her lover, but by degrees her passion increases until she ceases to think about
her body, and then finally she wishes to stop from further coition. This objection,
however, does not hold good, for even in ordinary things that revolve with great
force, such as a potter's wheel, or a top, we find that the motion at first
is slow, but by degrees it becomes very rapid. In the same way the passion of
the woman having gradually increased, she has a desire to discontinue coition,
when all the semen has fallen away. And there is a verse with regard to this
as follows:
'The fall of the semen of the man takes place only at the end of coition, while
the semen of the woman falls continually, and after the semen of both has all
fallen away then they wish for the discontinuance of coition.'
Lastly, Vatsyayana is of opinion that the semen
of the female falls in the same way as that of the male.
Now some may ask here: If men and women are beings of the same kind, and are
engaged in bringing about the same results, why should they have different works
to do?
Vatsya says that this is so, because the ways of working as well as the consciousness
of pleasure in men and women are different. The difference in the ways of working,
by which men are the actors, and women are the persons acted upon, is owing
to the nature of the male and the female, otherwise the actor would be sometimes
the person acted upon, and vice versa. And from this difference in the ways
of working follows the difference in the consciousness of pleasure, for a man
thinks, 'this woman is united with me', and a woman thinks, 'I am united with
this man'.
It may be said that, if the ways of working in men and women are different,
why should not there be a difference, even in the pleasure they feel, and which
is the result of those ways. But this objection is groundless, for, the person
acting and the person acted upon being of different kinds, there is a reason
for the difference in their ways of working; but there is no reason for any
difference in the pleasure they feel, because they both naturally derive pleasure
from the act they perform.
On this again some may say that when different persons are engaged in doing the same work, we find that they accomplish the same end or purpose; while, on the contrary, in the case of men and women we find that each of them accomplishes his or her own end separately, and this is inconsistent. But this is a mistake, for we find that sometimes two things are done at the same time, as for instance in the fighting of rams, both the rams receive the shock at the same time on their heads. Again, in throwing one wood apple against another, and also in a fight or struggle of wrestlers. If it be said that in these cases the things employed are of the same kind, it is answered that even in the case of men and women, the nature of the two persons is the same. And as the difference in their ways of working arises from the difference of their conformation only, it follows that men experience the same kind of pleasure as women do.
There is also a verse on this subject as follows:
'Men and women, being of the same nature, feel the same kind of pleasure, and
therefore a man should marry such a woman as will love him ever afterwards.'
The pleasure of men and women being thus proved
to be of the same kind, it follows that, in regard to time, there are nine kinds
of sexual intercourse, in the same way as there are nine kinds, according to
the force of passion.
There being thus nine kinds of union with regard to dimensions, force of passion,
and time, respectively, by making combinations of them, innumerable kinds of
union would be produced. Therefore in each particular kind of sexual union,
men should use such means as they may think suitable for the occasion.
At the first time of sexual union the passion of the male is intense, and his
time is short, but in subsequent unions on the same day the reverse of this
is the case. With the female, however, it is the contrary, for at the first
time her passion is weak, and then her time long, but on subsequent occasions
on the same day, her passion is intense and her time short, until her passion
is satisfied.
The Kama Sutra of Vatsayayana, Sir Richard Burton, translator (1883)
Come and say hello to Karene - join a friendly (kind, sexually enlightened, moral) network.
![]() Danger and Play: Nietzsche Desire for Women 'The true man wants two things: danger and play. For that reason he wants woman, as the most dangerous plaything.' |
![]() Philosopher Voltaire Victory by Seduction 'It is not enough to conquer; one must know how to seduce.' |
![]() Desire and Human Nature: Spinoza 'Desire is the essence of a man.' |
![]() Meaning of Being a Woman. de Beauvoir Quote on Nude Art 'One is not born, but rather becomes a woman.' |
![]() Porn Star Sex Guru Annie Sprinkle: Sexual Pleasure 'Let there be pleasure and ecstasy on earth and let it begin with me.' |
Related Links: Kama SutraEastern
Philosophy: Kama Sutra - 'Praised
be the three aims of life, virtue (dharma), prosperity (artha), and love (kama),
which are the subject of this work.' Kama Sutra
(Kama Shastra). Discussion and Quotes / Quotations, Pictures, Positions from
Famous Indian Sexual Philosophy of the Kama Sutra.
Contents:
Kama Sutra Pictures - Kama
Sutra Positions - Kama
Sutra: Women - Kama
Sutra: Partners - Kama
Sutra: Marriage - Kama
Sutra: Love Potions - Kama
Sutra: Sex Aids - Kama
Sutra: Homosexuality - Kama
Sutra: Embrace - Kama
Sutra: Kissing - Kama
Sutra: Scratching - Kama
Sutra: Biting - Kama
Sutra: Sighs and Blows - Kama
Sutra: Foreplay - Kama
Sutra: Role Reversal - Kama
Sutra: Fellatio
Kama Sutra Pages (different spelling): Kamasutra
- Kamasutra
Pictures - Kamasutra
Positions - Kama
- Karma
- Sutra
- Karmasutra
- Karma
Sutra - Karma
Sutra Pictures - Karma
Sutra Positions
Index / Home Page - Summary and
Links to articles on the Metaphysics
of Space and Motion and the Wave
Structure of Matter (WSM). What is the most Simple
Science Theory of Reality? Describing Reality from One
Thing, Space
(with properties of a nearly rigid continuous wave medium) rather than Many
Things (Matter). i. e. From Matter as discrete Particles
generating continuous Spherical Fields in Space-Time
to Matter as Spherical Standing Waves in Space (see diagram below).
Subjects include Truth,
Reality,
Metaphysics,
Physics, Einstein's
Relativity, Quantum
Theory, Cosmology,
Ancient
Greek Philosophy, Western
& Eastern Philosophy, Buddhism,
Hinduism,
Taoism,
Theology,
Evolution,
Nature
/ Ecology, Culture,
Art, Erotic
Art, Sexuality,
Feminism,
Health,
Politics,
Education
and Utopia.
Includes Pictures
and numerous Quotes
from many fine philosophers / physicists, including Plato,
Aristotle,
Rene
Descartes, Gottfried
Leibniz, Sir
Isaac Newton, Christiaan
Huygens, Spinoza,
George
Berkeley, David
Hume, Immanuel
Kant, Friedrich
Nietzsche, Nikola
Tesla, Max
Planck, Gandhi,
Albert Einstein,
Louis de
Broglie, Erwin
Schrodinger, Ludwig
Wittgenstein, Richard
Feynman and Milo
Wolff.
Currently Physics (and thus all human knowledge) is founded on the concepts of particles and forces in Space and Time, which assumes the existence of four separate things. This causes many problems for Humanity because the necessary connection between these things is unknown. The Metaphysics of Space and Motion and the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) solves these problems by describing Reality in terms of One thing, Space, existing with the Properties of a Wave Medium. Matter is formed from Spherical Standing Waves in Space which cause the 'particle' effect at their Wave Center. Time is due to the Wave Motion (activity) of Space. Forces are caused by the interaction of the Spherical In and Out Waves with other matter in Space which changes the location of the Wave-Center (and which we 'see' as a 'force accelerating a particle').
This rather abrupt summary is explained in substantially better detail on the Index / Homepage. If you have any questions, would like to submit content, or exchange links, please write to us (we like getting emails!).
Biography:
Geoff Haselhurst
Biography
Karene Howie - Bibliography
- Email
(George Berkeley, 1710) Nothing seems of more importance, towards
erecting a firm system of sound and real knowledge, which may be proof against
the assaults of scepticism, than to lay the beginning in a distinct explication
of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute
concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof,
so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.