"I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world." (Albert Einstein)
I don't actually 'see' things in my mind. What I mean is I can often correctly
find the correct mechanism of an unknown phenomenon which involves 3D geometric
data. Somehow my mind unravels the details of the data describing the phenomenon
and hits upon the mechanism which produces it. It is more like solving jig-saw
puzzles or playing the GO game. You search all the pieces and the ones which
fit suddenly pop into view. As the Japanese describe GO, there is a sense
of 'shape' for the correct stone placement.
This process often involves mathematics which describe physical processes.
However knowing math alone is useless for me. I MUST know the physical situations
described by math - and I MUST visualize the physical or mechanical details
of the math process - without that I can rarely use math successfully.
In other words, I use math differently than the textbooks explain it. I
don't go through analysis procedures to find a result, or to prove something
true. Instead math is a just another tool to find the pieces of the puzzles
that fit together. If I find a correct fit, for example, an explanation
of the de Broglie Wavelength, only then do I attempt to prove it. Proof
always comes last. Geoff Haselhurst
in Australia, thinks the same way I do, except that he uses philosophical
logic where I use math. Most of what I know of the Wave Structure of Matter
and cosmology, he independently found himself. We are cosmic twins on opposite
sides of the Earth.
Most of the physics work I have done which has been successful falls into
this class. I have a permanent reputation in space navigation and planetary
physics for interpretation of light scattering. But in fact, I am a poor
math-physicist. Instead, there is an unconscious search mechanism at work
in my mind but I don't control it or sense it. It just happens after I think
and worry a while. Of course, everything has to be proven before final acceptance.
I have a long memory for data of science puzzles so that, as an important
example, it is now glaringly obvious to me that the charge and mass substance
model of old physics is wrong, and the Wave Structure of Matter is an almost
perfect and very simple description of the natural laws. I genuinely cannot
understand why this is not immediately obvious to any scientist. The greatest
puzzle of physics for me, is the failure of scientists to understand it.
The old physics clearly produces many paradoxes, whereas the Wave Structure
of Matter has none. The old physics is a set of rules and procedures which
are obeyed, like a religion, without understanding the origins. The Wave
Structure begins with the simplicity of only three principles from which
all else follows mathematically and logically. Philosophically it is very
satisfying. Statistically, it is true.
Despite the teachings of the scientific methods, it appears that most scientists
do NOT seek to understand. Instead their personal satisfaction comes from
learning and following rules. Again, this oddly resembles the practice of
religion which most scientists deny. Old physics is Catholic, Wave Structure
of Matter is more Buddhist.
Milo Wolff, 2003
Milo
Wolff: Schrodinger's Universe and the Origin of the Natural Laws
(Published, April 2008)
Milo
Wolff: Exploring the Physics of the Unknown Universe
For more information on Dr Milo Wolff and his contributions to the Wave Structure of Matter please see the following articles and Digital Video Interviews.
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff-Wave-Structure-Matter.htm
- Abstract: The structure of the electron is investigated and found
closely entwined with the origin of the natural laws. The natural laws had
been measured for hundreds of years but no one knew how Nature creates them.
Richard Feynman wrote, speaking of the Conservation of Energy, Nature
has a hidden accountant who keeps honest books of energy input and output
but we don't know how she does it. The origins had been proposed earlier
by Clifford and Schrodinger, who pointed out that only a Wave Structure
of Matter (WSM), can explain natural laws (i.e. Wave Mechanics). Further,
Einstein realised that matter was spherical and spatially extended and thus
the Electron was not a point particle, but rather, a structure of space.
He writes;
Physical objects are not in space, but these objects
are spatially extended. In this way the concept empty space loses its meaning.
... Since the theory of general relativity implies the representation of
physical reality by a continuous field, the concept of particles
or material points cannot play a fundamental part, nor can the concept of
motion. The particle can only appear as a limited region in space in which
the field strength or the energy density are particularly high. (Albert
Einstein)
Einstein's error was to represent matter as a continuous spherical field
in space-time rather than as a Spherical Wave in continuous Space which
causes the spherical force field effects (as we shall shortly explain).
Using the WSM a quantitative origin has been found based on the wave structure
of the electron. It is shown that Space (the quantum wave medium) is a single
entity underlying electron structure and the laws. Three Principles are
found describing the wave medium, enabling calculation of particles and
the laws. The predictive power of the WSM is shown by deriving the previously
unknown physical origin of electron spin and making experimental predictions
which solve the paradoxes of the famous EPR experiment. The WSM has important
implications for research, industry, and our human role in the universe.
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff-Einstein-EPR-Experiment.htm
- Abstract: In l935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR)
put forward a gedanken (thought) experiment whose outcome they thought was
certain to show that there existed natural phenomena that quantum theory
could not account for. The experiment was based on the concept that two
events cannot influence each other if the distance between them is greater
than the distance light could travel in the time available. In other words,
only local events inside the light sphere can influence one another.
Their experimental concept was later used by John Bell (1964) to frame a
theorem which showed that either the statistical predictions of quantum
theory or the Principle of Local Events is incorrect. It did not say which
one was false but only that both cannot be true, although it was clear that
Einstein expected The Principle to be affirmed.
When later experiments (Clauser & Freedman 1972; Aspect, Dalibard, and
Roger, 1982; and others) confirmed that quantum theory was correct, the
conclusion was startling. The Principle of Local Events failed, forcing
us to recognize that the world is not the way it appears. What then is the
real nature of our world?
The important impact of Bell's Theorem and the experiments is that they
clearly thrust a formerly only philosophical dilemma of quantum theory into
the real world. They show that post-modern physics’ ideas about the
world are somehow profoundly deficient. No one understood these results
and only scant scientific attention has been paid to them. With the recent
discoveries on the Wave Structure of Matter we can now understand the cause
of these apparently 'spooky' actions at a distance.
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/Wolff-Feynman-QED.htm
- Abstract: Lack of knowledge of energy transfer between
particles is a major obstacle in understanding physics, matter, and the
Universe. In 1945 Wheeler and Feynman sought the mechanism of energy transfer
by calculating e-m radiation from an accelerated electron. The electron
generated outward and inward waves and evoked a response of the universe
from absorber charges. This paper compares Wheeler and Feynman’s work
with a rigorous solution using the scalar wave equation that finds a quantum-wave
electron structure based upon two fundamental principles of Nature. This
is equivalent to replacing the material point electron with a spherical
quantum-wave electron, a new structure in main-stream thinking but fulfilling
a proposal by Schrodinger (Quantum Wave Mechanics). Surprisingly, all the
natural laws are found embedded in the wave structure of the electron –
as envisioned by Schrodinger.
1.
Milo Wolff Digital Video Interview (Windows Media, 1,100K). 'I
was curious! ... ' - On his lifelong (slightly obsessive!) motivation
to find the cause of the de Broglie wavelength of Quantum
Theory / Wave Mechanics. His discovery (in 1986) that a Spherical
Wave Structure of Matter deduced Doppler shifts (due to
relative motion of the Spherical In and Out-Waves and the Wave-Center) that
correctly corresponded to the de Broglie Wavelength of matter. Of even more
significance is the fact that within these same simple wave equations were
the correct terms for the Frequency-Mass-Energy increases
with Motion as deduced by Einstein' Special Relativity.
Thus for the first time finding a fundamental theoretical and mathematical
unification of these two famous theories. (REAL).
More
video interviews of Dr Milo Wolff on Physics and the Wave Structure of Matter.
Milo Wolff: Thinking Mind - Mathematical Physicist Dr Milo Wolff on how his mind thinks in terms of models rather than mathematics. Interesting and important to maths physics!
Discoveries of Milo Wolff & Geoff Haselhurst - A list of the independent discoveries of Mathematical Physicist Dr Milo Wolff and Natural Philosopher Geoff Haselhurst on the Wave Structure of Matter.
http://www.QuantumMatter.com (Milo Wolff's Website on the Wave Structure of Matter)
 Facebook
Connect |
 Google
Friends |
 Twitter
Tweets |
 Follow@philosophytruth |
 Share |
 PhilosophyShop |
 FreePostcards |
 RSS |
Eastern
Philosophy Wisdom Quotes
Ancient
Greek Philosophy
Heraclitus
Logos Dynamic Unity
Socrates
Wisdom Truth Apology
Plato's
Republic
Aristotle
Unity Metaphysics
Marcus
Aurelius
Benedict
Spinoza Ethics in Motion
Gottfried
Leibniz
George
Berkeley
David
Hume
Immanuel
Kant
Friedrich
Nietzsche
Political
Science Global Politics
Ed.
Philosophy
Philosophy
of Art
Philosophy
of Mind
Postmodernism
Simple
Metaphysics
Mathematical
Einstein
Quantum Physics
Cosmology
Philosophy
Theology
Evolution
Health
Education
Politics
- Send a very cool philosophy / wisdom postcard -
Facebook Connect
Connect in an Inter-Connected Universe!
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
(George Orwell)
Google Friends
Making the Universe more Friendly!
"Hell is Truth Seen Too Late."
(Thomas Hobbes)
Twitter Updates
Philosophy Physics Truth Reality
Unity / Wisdom Quotes & Tweets
Help Humanity
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world."
(Mohandas Gandhi)
The free, unhampered exchange of ideas and scientific conclusions is necessary for the sound development of science, as it is in all spheres of cultural life. ... We must not conceal from ourselves that no improvement in the present depressing situation is possible without a severe struggle; for the handful of those who are really determined to do something is minute in comparison with the mass of the lukewarm and the misguided. ...
Humanity is going to need a substantially new way of thinking if it is to survive!" (Albert Einstein)
This is the profound new way of thinking that Einstein realised, that we exist as spatially extended structures of the universe - the discrete and separate body an illusion. This simply confirms the intuitions of the ancient philosophers and mystics.
Given the current censorship in physics / philosophy of science journals (based on the standard model of particle physics / big bang cosmology) the internet is the best hope for getting new knowledge known to the world. But that depends on you, the people who care about science and society, realise the importance of truth and reality.
It is easy to help - just click on the social network sites (below) or grab a nice image / quote you like and add it to your favourite blog, wiki or forum. We are listed as one of the top philosophy sites on the Internet (600,000 page views / week) and have a wonderful collection of knowledge from the greatest minds in human history, so people will appreciate your contributions. Thanks! Geoff Haselhurst - Karene Howie - Email
Connect with Geoffrey
Support simple sensible science that works
YouTube MySpace Facebook Twitter
"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing."
(Edmund Burke)