Hi Everyone,
Like most people I grew up with science founded on 'particles', and cosmology
founded on the 'big bang' theory. At the time I just accepted it as true
with little thought. Now, at the age of 47 and having spent the last 15
years reading physics,
philosophy and
metaphysics
I am completely convinced that both the 'particle' and the 'big bang' are
incorrect. (In fact I would now say that they are extremely naive and silly
conceptions and I find it hard to believe that I used to accept them as
true!)
Below you will find a list of the top ten problems of the Big Bang Theory of Cosmology. Most importantly, it is easy to show how these problems can be simply solved with the most simple explanation of physical reality - the Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) in Space.
For the enthusiasts we have four very good essays on various problems of the Big Bang Theory which provide compelling evidence that the Big Bang theory is wrong.
'The Big Bang Never Happened' by Eric J. Lerner
'The Big Bang Theory Under Fire' by William C. Mitchell
The Top 30 Problems of the Big Bang Theory by Tom Van Flandern
Please also read the short Cosmology essay;
Cosmology:
How our Finite Spherical Observable Universe exists within Infinite Eternal
Space.
Geoff Haselhurst
Sorry Sorry Sorry - I was meant to write this up months ago.
Will do it soon! March, 2008
For now - the articles listed above are all very good!
Geoff Haselhurst
Some good websites on the problems of the big bang theory of cosmology.
http://www.bigbangneverhappened.org/ - In 1991, my book, the Big Bang Never Happened (Vintage), presented evidence that the Big Bang theory was contradicted by observations and that another approach, plasma cosmology, which hypothesized a universe without begin or end, far better explained what we know of the cosmos. The book set off a considerable debate. Since then, observations have only further confirmed these conclusions, although the Big Bang remains by far the most widely accepted theory of cosmology. (Eric Lerner)
http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/ - In the web pages below, we present explanations which are compatible with Newtonian and semi-classical physics. We apply the principle of causality and avoid models requiring a probabilistic existence of matter and non-locality. This differs from the current approach of modern physics. (Paul Marmet)
http://cosmologystatement.org/
- An Open Letter to the Scientific Community. The big bang today relies
on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never
observed - inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent
examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the
observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory.
In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical
objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation.
It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the
underlying theory. (Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)