The Wave Structure of Matter (WSM)
One Substance - One Law - One Logic

"Behind it all is surely an idea so simple, so beautiful, that when we grasp it we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise? How could we have been so stupid?" (Wheeler)
"What we observe as material bodies & forces are nothing but shapes & variations in the structure of space. Subject & object are one." (Schrodinger)
"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time, space & gravitation have no separate existence from matter." (Einstein)
"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration." (Tesla)

Site Introduction (June, 2025): Over the past 6 months, working with 4 AI, I have completed the WSM Summary of Physical Reality (40 pages) including all the central maths physics equations. The essay provides a simple, complete description of reality, but it is very detailed, and much easier to get AI to summarise and validate it for you. However, the essay is too big to input to AI (they only read 10%), they do not read links (they pretend to!), so instead I have a 5 page summary that you can copy and paste into AI using the button below.

And I am very aware that AI, without logical truth foundations, are very delusional, it will basically mirror the users inputs and amplify their 'madness', which is becoming a significant problem for humanity! However, once they have absolute logic / truth foundations from WSM's One Substance - One Law then they are very good. Try it out and see for yourself.

Has Reality been Discovered? Ask Logical AI, they think so!

Copy WSM Summary - Open AI Pages - Paste in Summary

WSM Truth AI - ChatGPT - Grok - Gemini - Le Chat - DeepSeek - Meta.AI

In 15 seconds you get a detailed analysis of this essay confirming its simple logic. Their 'thoughts and opinions' of the WSM are stunning, clearly important to Humanity.
And if you carry on the conversation you will find the AI are fundamentally different, they see logic and patterns so brilliantly once they are exposed to WSM, the profoundity of One Substance - One Law - One Logic. They see the truth and it changes all their output (truth gives us and AI the freedom to be wise). Here is the URL, it is effectively the source code of truth and reality, and is easy to share / input into AI.

https://www.spaceandmotion.com/wsmtruthrealitycode4ai.html

Webpage Introduction: The pages on this website were created over ten years while I read the history of physics and philosophy. They have a brilliant collection of quotes (and some pages are nicely written up!). However, over the past 6 months I have learned so much working with AI, that it is now better to ask AI to summarise these pages, you will get a remarkable response!

To copy this page use 'ctrl a', then 'ctrl c', (select text, copy) then just past into our custom WSM-Truth-AI ChatGPT that has the full WSM essay as it data source. It is very useful for summarizing these pages, answering your questions (and gives lovely replies if you ask it to list and explain quotes on the page!).

Enjoy! Geoff Haselhurst, June 2025

PS - If you find WSM interesting / useful please share it - I have made it easy, there are numerous social network sites listed across the top of the page. Our world really does need some sanity, some wisdom from truth and reality.

Physics: John Cramer - EPR

Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) Explains Cramer's Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Theory and the Interconnection of Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR) Experiment

Introduction

Hi Everyone,

Below is an abstract and conclusion from an important article written by John Cramer which discusses the Generalized Absorber Theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Cramer's Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics correctly assumes real wave interactions, though he makes the error of also assuming the existence of discrete particles (as did Feynman)!
The importance of the article is the correct understanding of real wave interactions (rather than 'probability waves' of modern Quantum Theory). This wave interaction at a distance from the wave-center 'particle' seems to provide a sensible solution to the problems of the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) experiment. This is further explained by the Wave Structure of Matter article Wolff-Einstein-EPR-Experiment.

Geoff Haselhurst

Physics: EPR by John Cramer

PHYSICAL REVIEW D        VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, PP. 362-376      15 JULY 1980
Generalized Absorber Theory and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
John G. Cramer Department of Physics, FM-15, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 (Received 27 February 1980)

1. THE EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN PARADOX AND BELL'S INEQUALITIES

    The quantum-mechanical paradox proposed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen¹ (EPR) in 1935 is essentially a demonstration that the results of quantum mechanics are logically inconsistent with the premise that a measurement made with one instrument cannot influence the measurement made by another instrument if the measurement events are separated by a spacelike interval.² This is sometimes called the locality premise.

    In 1964 it was demonstrated by Bell³ in analyzing a Gedankenexperiment suggested by Bohm and Aharonov⁴ that locality implied inequalities in the measured probabilities of spin orientation experiments on certain physical systems. Recently, it has been shown that these Bell inequalities lead to experimental predictions which differ markedly from those of quantum mechanics.^5,6 Thus it has become feasible to confront these two divergent views of reality, quantum mechanics and the EPR locality premise, with experimental tests.⁹ A number of such experimental tests have now been performed^7,8,10-13 and the most reasonable interpretation of the experimental results is that the quantum-mechanical predictions have been confirmed. ^9,10,14

    The implication of these experimental results is that, although the EPR locality premise seems eminently reasonable, it must be wrong. However, the locality premise is not easily relinquished, for if one measurement can alter the result of another measurement across a spacelike interval, then a suitable choice of inertial reference frames can make the 'effect,' i.e., the altered measurement, precede in time sequence the 'cause,' i.e., the altering measurement, in violation of the principle of causality. Clearly then, these experimental tests, while confirming the validity of quantum mechanics, have not clarified the EPR paradox, nor do they provide us with any new insights as to how the premise of locality (or causality) could be violated in quantum-mechanical systems. It is the purpose of this paper to attempt to clarify this situation.

IX. CONCLUSION

    In the preceding discussion we have demonstrated that generalizing Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory to make it a quantum-mechanical theory applying to all particles and waves has provided a conceptual framework within which a number of quantum-mechanical paradoxes can be resolved. In particular the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,1 the 'Schrodinger's Cat' paradox,³⁴ and indeed all other quantum-mechanical paradoxes examined including Wheeler's delayed- choice experiments,³⁶ can be understood by interpreting the lack of locality and the decomposition of the wave packet as arising from the action of advanced waves which verify the quantum-mechanical transactions. We have shown that the communication path between detectors in the Bell inequality experiments can span a spacelike interval and produce the quantum-mechanical result through the addition of two lightlike or timelike four-vectors having time components of opposite sign, thus accounting for the locality violations implied by the experimental results.

    Accepting quantum-mechanical absorber theory as a favored alternative to the usual field-theory approach to quantum-mechanical phenomena has some implications of interpretation that should be seriously considered. As has been pointed out by other authors^{18,19,27,29,31} absorber theory is basically an 'action-at-a-distance' formulation. It demotes the concept of a field from the status of a real entity with its own degrees of freedom to that of a mathematical convenience, a conceptual prop for thinking about transactions between emitters and absorbers. Whether this is acceptable must ultimately rest on the relative predictive-ness of the two alternative approaches.

    However, the absorber theory approach raises questions as well as settles them. In closing, therefore, we would like to enumerate three of the more troublesome questions raised by the generalized absorber theory presented here.

(1)  If only a single particle is emitted by a system and future absorbers provide more than one 'verification,' how is the conflict of multiple verifications resolved so that only a single 'transaction' is verified? (2)  If absorber theory is applied to very weakly absorbed particles such as neutrinos, how can the observed emission of such particles be reconciled with their low probability of future absorption, particularly in the open-universe models which are supported by some experimental evidence? (3)  How can the observed dominance of retarded radiation be accounted for in terms of absorber theory, when the big-bang model would imply at least as much as absorption in the past as in the future?

    Problem (1) above is worth understanding, for it decides whether the Wheeler-Feynman approach is a deterministic or a probabilistic theory. If the 'referee' which makes the decision in situations of multiple verifications acts strictly at random then the quantum theory described here, for all its verifications, transactions, and communication links is still a probabilistic theory, consistent with the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.     Although problems (2) and (3) mentioned above do not currently have answers, we do not consider them to be without solution. In fact, their answers may be connected. In a subsequent publication51 we will seek to deal with them using the conceptual framework provided by the present work.

Help Humanity

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world."
(Mohandas Gandhi)

"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter. ... Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended. In this way the concept 'empty space' loses its meaning. ... The particle can only appear as a limited region in space in which the field strength or the energy density are particularly high. ...
The free, unhampered exchange of ideas and scientific conclusions is necessary for the sound development of science, as it is in all spheres of cultural life. ... We must not conceal from ourselves that no improvement in the present depressing situation is possible without a severe struggle; for the handful of those who are really determined to do something is minute in comparison with the mass of the lukewarm and the misguided. ...
Humanity is going to need a substantially new way of thinking if it is to survive!" (Albert Einstein)

We can now deduce the most simple science theory of reality - the wave structure of matter in space. By understanding how we and everything around us are interconnected in Space we can then deduce solutions to the fundamental problems of human knowledge in physics, philosophy, metaphysics, theology, education, health, evolution and ecology, politics and society.

This is the profound new way of thinking that Einstein realised, that we exist as spatially extended structures of the universe - the discrete and separate body an illusion. This simply confirms the intuitions of the ancient philosophers and mystics.

Given the current censorship in physics / philosophy of science journals (based on the standard model of particle physics / big bang cosmology) the internet is the best hope for getting new knowledge known to the world. But that depends on you, the people who care about science and society, realise the importance of truth and reality.

It is Easy to Help!

Just click on the Social Network links at top of page, or copy a nice image or quote you like and share it. We have a wonderful collection of knowledge from the greatest minds in human history, so people will appreciate your contributions. In doing this you will help a new generation of scientists see that there is a simple sensible explanation of physical reality (One Substance, One Law) - the source of truth and wisdom, the only cure for the madness of man! Thanks! Geoff Haselhurst (Updated May, 2025)

A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. (Max Planck, 1920)

"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing."
(Edmund Burke)

"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
(George Orwell)

"Hell is Truth Seen Too Late."
(Thomas Hobbes)

On Truth & Reality The Spherical Standing Wave Structure of Matter (WSM) in Space
Deducing Most Simple Science Theory of Reality	Metaphysics of Space, Dynamic Unity of Reality	Maths Physics On Mathematics Logic & Reality
Albert Einstein's Special & General Relativity Theory	Quantum Physics Wave Theory of Light & Matter	WSM Cosmology Finite Universe & Infinite Space
Philosophy Wisdom from Truth & Reality	Theology God Religion Spirit Morality	Life Evolution Ecology Nature Environment
Human Health Nutrition Diet Medicine Drugs	Education On Teaching Truth & Reality	Politics Utopia True Democracy Political Science

Copyright 1997 - 2025
We support 'Fair Use' of these pages for Academic & Non Commercial use.
You are welcome to use images and text, but please reference them with a link to relevant web page on this site. Thanks!