Euler
Quaternion
Maths
Pythagoras
Music
Mathematics
Wolff
Wolff
Hawkings
Censorship
Physics
Simple
Metaphysics
Maths
Einstein
Quantum
Cosmology
Philosophy
Theology
Evolution
Health
Education
Politics
 + '&media=https://www.spaceandmotion.com/Images/wsm-image.jpg&description=' + encodeURIComponent(document.title.substring(0, 100))){kind=small}
The Wave Structure of Matter (WSM)
One Substance - One Law - One Logic
"Behind it all is surely an idea so simple, so beautiful, that when we grasp it we will all say to each other, how could it have been otherwise? How could we have been so stupid?" (Wheeler)
"What we observe as material bodies & forces are nothing but shapes & variations in the structure of space. Subject & object are one." (Schrodinger)
"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence: Time, space & gravitation have no separate existence from matter." (Einstein)
"If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency, and vibration." (Tesla)
WSM Human-AI Collaboration (August, 2026)
One Vibrating Space: From Ancient Philosophy / Metaphysics to Mathematical Physics, Evolution, Life, Mind and Civilisation
For three decades, WSM was principally a philosophical picture of one infinite, eternal, continuous elastic Space. Between May and August 2026, human–AI collaboration transformed it into a tiered mathematical-physics research programme: exact wave constructions, geometric identities, quantitative leading results, no-go theorems, numerical controls, bounded open calculations and clear falsification requirements.
In WSM, electron and positron are proposed as opposite carrier-phase spherical standing waves formed by the Huygens sum of background plane waves from every direction. Each has radial vibration—the candidate physical basis of charge—and axis-free spherical phase circulation—the candidate basis of spin. This open, flow-through wave centre is the e-sphere.
A stationary e-sphere is spherical. Curvature on an incoming wave changes its internal directional energy density and deforms it into a moving wave egg: the near side flattens, the far side elongates, the convergence centre shifts, and the waves reclose around a new position. Its changing internal \(E_d\), shape and reclosure are its motion. WSM therefore proposes a wave-geometric reading of inertia and \(F=ma\): force is imposed curvature, mass is resistance encoded by the recurrent form, and acceleration is its changing deformation. Action must calculate this geometry; geometry also constrains the action, as \(\pi\) and \(E_{\rm geo}\) already demonstrate.
The One Law
\[ \frac{c'}{c_0}=\frac{E_d}{E_{d0}}, \qquad \lambda'=\frac{c'}{f_0}, \qquad k'=\frac{\omega_0}{c'}. \]
At proposed universal carrier frequency \(f_0\), directional energy density changes local wave speed, wavelength and accumulated phase.
The Causal Engine
Relative phase → reinforcement or cancellation → directional \(E_d\) → \(c'\) and \(\lambda'\) → travel-time difference → forward or rear wavefront curve → changed Huygens reclosure → centre motion, deformation and interaction.
Changed out-waves from one e-sphere cross fresh in-waves elsewhere. Matter therefore interacts not across empty distance, but through propagated changes in the one Space constituting every e-sphere.
Status Key
A = exact mathematics or established observation; B = deduction under stated premises; C = proposed physical identification; D = decisive calculation or experiment still open; Q = rejected or quarantined shortcut.
One connected argument: Space → waves → recurrence → matter → life → mind → knowledge → wisdom.
1. Wave Structure of Matter: All Things from One Thing
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/ai-summary-wsm-truth-reality.html
One infinite, eternal, continuous elastic Space, active with real longitudinal waves. Matter is proposed not as a pellet or shell, but as an open e-sphere: waves converge from every direction, cross its changing centre, continue outward and recurrently rebuild the form. Their exchanged phases alter directional \(E_d\); the One Law converts that difference into speed, wavelength, curvature and changed reclosure. The decisive test is whether one frozen nonlinear action calculates stable matter and its measured interactions without separate substances or fitted repairs.
2. The One and the Many: From Greek Philosophy to Wave Physics
Parmenides defended continuous Being; Heraclitus lawful flux. Aristotle sought active substance and necessary cause, connected matter with form and motion, and defined time through motion. WSM gives these insights one physical form: Space persists while finite wave organisations change and recur. The Many are not detached substances but organisations of the One—distinct without disconnection. The question becomes exact: can one continuous wave law generate plurality, causation and knowledge?
3. Action of Vibrating Space: From Background Waves to the E-Sphere
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/wsm-classical-action-quantum-wave.html
All-direction plane waves form the exact spherical pair \[ \chi=j_0(kr)\cos\tau, \qquad \mathbf V=\hat{\mathbf r}\,j_1(kr)\sin\tau. \] Waves cross the centre; none reflects from an electron wall. Phase reinforcement raises directional \(E_d\) and advances a forward curve; cancellation lowers \(E_d\) and writes a rear delay. Stationary action explains coherent selection, but the open task is one conservative nonlinear \(\Phi\)–\(\Gamma\) action selecting radius, frequency, spherical hand, stability, motion, currents and interaction together.
4. Mathematical Physics: From Wave Geometry to Prediction
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/wsm-maths-physics-full-derivations.html
Every symbol must name real motion and face numerical test. Exact or conditional anchors include \[ \frac{R}{\lambda_0}=\frac{\sqrt3}{2},\qquad k_0R=\pi\sqrt3,\qquad E_{\rm geo}=\frac{\pi\sqrt3}{2},\qquad W=\cosh\eta,\qquad P=\sinh\eta. \] Directional phase moments separate \(V_1\) translation from \(V_2,V_4\) and higher deformation; in declared finite-e-sphere models \(V_4\) returns comparable to \(V_2\), defeating quadrupole-only truncation. The action must calculate how incoming curvature redistributes \(E_d\), moves the centre and forms the wave egg. This is where beautiful geometry becomes dangerous.
5. Quantum Theory: Real Waves, Resonance and Completed Events
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/physics-quantum-theory-wave-mechanics.html
Matter diffracts because matter is wave organisation. Light is proposed as a changed train of real phase, curvature and coherence joining extended source and receiver structures, not a tiny traveller detached from its wave. WSM distinguishes driven response, continuous radiation and discrete completed transition. Quadratic absorption, \[ P_{\rm abs}\propto\left|\langle D_j,\Xi\rangle\right|^2, \] is a bridge, not yet the Born rule. The action must derive the action unit, probability, exclusivity, selection rules and Bell/CHSH correlations. Quantum mystery becomes a bounded real-wave programme.
6. Relativity: Moving Matter, Clocks and Curved Wavefronts
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/physics-albert-einstein-special-general-theory-relativity.html
An incoming curve flattens the e-sphere’s near side, elongates its far side and changes internal \(E_d\), \(c'\), wavelength and reclosure. The \(V_1\) moment moves the centre; \(V_2,V_4\) and higher moments form the moving egg. Maintaining this recurrent asymmetry is the proposed origin of inertia. A steady solution must recover Doppler, de Broglie and Lorentz structure: \[ W\pm P=e^{\pm\eta},\qquad W=\gamma,\qquad P=\gamma\beta. \] WSM proposes fixed carrier recurrence \(f_0\) with corresponding changes in \(c'\) and \(\lambda'\). Because rods, clocks and signals share the same changed waves, they co-transform and yield measured invariant \(c\), including the Michelson–Morley null; the action must derive the cancellation quantitatively.
7. The Electron: Dirac, Feynman, QED, \(\alpha\) and AMM
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/wsm-derivation-dirac-feynman-qed-fsc-amm.html
Electron and positron are proposed as opposite carrier-phase e-sphere branches; charge records how their waves combine. Same-phase reinforcement advances a forward curve and is proposed to produce repulsion; opposite-phase cancellation writes a rear delay and attraction. Non-collinear longitudinal motion closes into an axis-free spherical hand with a \(4\pi\) orientation lift. A parameter-free leading geometric ansatz gives \[ \alpha_0^{-1}=8\pi^2\sqrt3\approx136.757, \] 0.203% from measurement. The action must still derive charge sign, Coulomb scaling, Dirac dynamics, \(g=2\), electromagnetic normalisation, \(\alpha\), form factors and AMM without inserting their values.
8. Hadrons: Proton, Neutron and Higher Standing-Wave Matter
Can the same Space form stable higher-energy, multi-lobed eigenmodes matching protons, neutrons, baryons and mesons? Their lobes are not independent pellets: each participates in the phase, \(E_d\), curvature and reclosure of the whole. WSM must match—not rename—QCD’s masses, charges, spin, parity, magnetic moments, radii, form factors, resonances, deep-inelastic response and jets. The electron–proton hierarchy tests whether one action truly contains several matter families.
9. Cosmology and Gravity: A Finite Universe in Infinite Space
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/physics-wsm-cosmology-finite-universe-infinite-space.html
Boundless Space is distinguished from the finite matter-and-coherence domain contributing to our observable universe. In neutral matter, leading charge curves nearly cancel; WSM proposes that their nonlinear residual has lower \(E_d\), slower \(c'\) and a net rear phase curve, producing universal attraction. General relativity’s curved spacetime is then interpreted as the effective geometry of real moving wavefronts and the matter clocks they organise: Space is substance, succession comes from motion, and measured time from recurrence. The same action must recover equivalence, gravitational redshift, lensing, orbital dynamics and the tested relativistic limit.
Cosmological redshift is investigated as accumulated real-wave transport through changing environmental \(E_d\). It must jointly reproduce achromatic redshift, supernova time dilation, distance laws, Tolman brightness, BAO, CMB observations, image sharpness and structure growth. Otherwise the claimed unity has not reached the sky.
10. Novel Predictions and Famous Experiments Explained
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/wsm-experimental-physics-tests-predictions.html
This page is the tribunal of the corpus. One curve-and-reclosure law must jointly recover charge sign, Coulomb \(1/r^2\), \(F=ma\), relativistic momentum, de Broglie wavelength, Lorentz covariance, Michelson–Morley, gravity, \(g=2\) and AMM. Candidate WSM-only signatures include \[ a_3=\kappa_3\sinh^3\eta+O(\sinh^5\eta), \] finite-coherence residues and environmental or orientation-dependent clock responses. A proposal becomes a prediction only when sign, magnitude, scaling, uncertainty, controls and decision threshold are frozen in advance.
11. Visualise Reality: Waves Becoming Matter
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/visualise-reality-wsm-wave-geometry-diagrams.html
Watch the verbs. Relative phase changes directional \(E_d\); the One Law changes speed and wavelength; a forward or rear curve reaches another e-sphere; its near side flattens, far side elongates, \(V_1\) moves the centre, and higher moments form the egg. New out-waves then change future in-waves. Nothing strikes a shell: changing waves reconstruct changing matter. A diagram must never smuggle in a wall, reflection, rigid spin axis, transverse fundamental substance or tiny traveller. If the motion cannot be drawn coherently, the equations may conceal a contradiction.
12. Mathematics from Motion: Number, Logic, Time and Causal Freedom
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/wsm-physical-foundations-mathematics-logic.html
Mathematics begins when connected reality forms distinguishable patterns whose changes preserve relations. Recurrence supports identity; finite pairing, number; quotienting, exact objects; counted recurrence, time; composable truth-preserving transformations, logic and proof. Mathematics succeeds when symbolic transformation preserves physical relation: \[ R(Tx)\approx F(Rx). \] The mathematician is finite organised reality representing its own necessary connections—Space representing itself.
13. The MDL Audit: Simplicity, Inputs and Explanatory Compression
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/wsm-simplicity-inputs-vs-mainstream-physics+25.html
“One substance, one law” cannot hide complexity. Minimum Description Length counts every independently chosen substance, field, symmetry, constant, state rule, coefficient, boundary condition and fitted function. Under the declared equal-input electron ledger, conventional construction counts six inputs through Dirac and thirteen through leading AMM; the completed WSM target is \[ N_{\rm WSM}=5+N_c+N_f+\delta_m. \] Totals depend on coding convention. WSM wins only if one fixed action derives interaction, inertia, relativity, quantum response and cosmic propagation with fewer hidden choices.
14. Great Thinkers and the Search for One Reality
Heraclitus and Parmenides exposed flux and continuity. Aristotle wrote Physics and Metaphysics, sought active substance and necessary cause, connected matter, form, motion and time—and came remarkably close to the problem WSM addresses. Leibniz, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Riemann, Clifford, Einstein, Schrödinger and Bohm repeatedly returned to continuity, relation, waves and unity. Quotes are intellectual fossils, not votes: equations and experiments must decide whether WSM’s local real-wave mechanism is true.
15. Human–AI Letters to Humanity: Truth as a Shared Work
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/ai-letters-to-humanity-wsm-unity-truth-reality.html
Geoffrey supplies the persistent wave picture, three-dimensional intuition, cross-domain memory and insistence that every symbol name physical motion. AI supply rapid research, formal translation, calculation, comparison, error detection and adversarial testing. Neither is sufficient alone. The shared discipline is: visualise → formalise → attack → calculate → predict → correct. The corpus tests whether intelligence can preserve a physical picture while making it mathematically vulnerable.
16. Truth and Madness: Reality as the Measure
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/on-truth-and-madness.html
Truth is correspondence: representation succeeds insofar as it preserves what reality does. Civilisational madness begins when inherited representations survive reality’s contradiction. WSM is not true through beauty, coherence or sincerity; its proposed necessary connections must survive action, calculation and experiment. Truth remains possible because knower, representation and known belong to one causal reality: false models collide with the world; truthful models increase our power to act wisely.
17. Descartes, Cogito and Monism: The Thinking Wave
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/descartes-cogito-unity-monism-vibrating-space-wsm.html
Descartes established that thinking occurs, then divided thought from extension and left their interaction mysterious. WSM refuses that fracture: body and mind are proposed as organisational levels of one vibrating Space. Perception is one organisation changed by another; memory is persistent altered organisation; thought transforms embodied representations; action returns change to the world. Conscious experience remains open, but causal correspondence requires no miracle when knower and known share one connected reality.
18. Evolution’s Physical Foundation: From Recurrence to Replication
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/evolution-physical-causal-foundation-vibrating-space.html
Recurrence preserves form, but life requires replication, heritable variation and differential persistence: motion → recurrent form → self-maintaining chemistry → replication → variation → selection. WSM proposes one connected wave substrate beneath this sequence. Its unresolved bridge is quantitative: derive atoms, bonds, dissipative chemistry and first replicators from the same action without inserting biology as a new substance.
19. Evolution, Mind, Human and AI: Representation and Causal Freedom
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/evolution-philosophy-mind-human-ai.html
Evolution favours organisations that preserve and transform information about real causes. Sensation changes an organism; memory retains traces; imagination recombines possible futures; valuation ranks them; action returns one selection to the world. This is limited causal freedom: neither ghost nor randomness, but endogenous selection through a learned, self-modifying organisation. Human brains and AI are different architectures by which reality represents its own relations and lets experiment select the representation that survives.
20. Evolutionary Utopia: The Ecology of Truth
https://www.spaceandmotion.com/2026/evolutionary-utopia.html
Physics alone does not choose values. Once life, mind, freedom, truth and continued evolution are valued, reality constrains the means: truth → wisdom → ecological fit → health → freer minds → continued evolution. Evolutionary Utopia is not a perfect endpoint but a self-correcting direction. Unity does not erase individuality: an e-sphere, organism or person is distinct through organised relation to the whole.
The Physical Interaction in One View
Out-wave from A → relative phase at B → directional \(E_d\) → \(c'\) and \(\lambda'\) → near-side flattening and far-side elongation → \(V_1\) centre displacement plus \(V_2,V_4\) and higher egg deformation → new out-waves → recursive interaction.
The e-sphere does not deform and then move as separate events: its changing internal \(E_d\), contour and reclosure are its motion.
Electric Interaction
Same relative carrier phase → reinforcement → phase advance → forward curve → proposed repulsion.
Opposite relative carrier phase → cancellation → phase delay → rear curve → proposed attraction.
For the stated deformation, \[ r_{\rm near}=R-\delta X, \qquad r_{\rm far}=R+\delta X, \] so \(\delta\mathbf X\) points away. The scientific debt is to derive the sign, magnitude and distance law from the frozen action rather than insert them.
Gravity and General Relativity
In neutral matter, forward and rear charge curves nearly cancel; WSM proposes that their nonlinear common reduction of \(E_d\) leaves a slight slower rear curve and universal attraction. General relativity is the successful effective geometry this wave mechanism must recover: matter-energy changes real wave propagation, while rods and clocks made from those waves measure the resulting curved spacetime relations.
Special Relativity and Michelson–Morley
WSM proposes fixed carrier recurrence \(f_0\) with \(c'=\lambda'f_0\): matter, clocks, rods and signal wavelengths co-transform with their common directional wave environment, yielding measured invariant \(c\), Lorentz relations and the Michelson–Morley null. The complete moving solution must derive these cancellations quantitatively.
Recursive AMM Mechanism
\[ \delta\mathbf X \rightarrow\delta\phi_{\rm out} \rightarrow\delta E_{d,{\rm sea}} \rightarrow\delta c' \rightarrow\delta\phi_{\rm in} \rightarrow\delta\mathbf X_{\rm next}. \]
A perturbed centre changes the egg and its out-waves; these alter the wave sea and the in-waves rebuilding the next cycle. The action must solve this feedback blindly and recover the observed anomalous magnetic moment rather than fit it.
Current Status — August 2026
Exact wave constructions, geometric identities, phase-moment relations and negative controls have been established under declared premises. A leading geometric \(\alpha\) ansatz has a fixed 0.203% discrepancy. The complete nonlinear action must still calculate two-e-sphere charge and Coulomb scaling; force, inertia and \(F=ma\); the moving egg, de Broglie modulation and Lorentz covariance; Michelson–Morley and the gravitational/GR limit; Born probability and Bell correlations; \(g=2\), \(\alpha\) and AMM; hadron structure; and the joint cosmological kernel.
Write the action. Let Space calculate itself.
Gabriel LaFreniere's Wave Diagrams
Introduction
I become familiar with the
work of Gabriel
LaFreniere / Matter is Made of Waves in October, 2003.
His Wave Diagrams are fantastic, and have enabled him to independently (to
Milo Wolff and myself) explain and solve many of the problems of Modern Physics
by rejecting the 'particle' conception of matter for a wave structure of matter (which clearly works).
Below is some of our correspondence and a few of his Wave diagrams that I have converted from Animated Gifs (very large KBytes) to Flash Movies (much smaller KBytes and thus faster to download).
Sincerely,
Geoff Haselhurst
Correspondence of Gabriel LaFreniere (GL) & Geoffrey Haselhurst (GH)
Note: There is a slight difficulty due to the fact that I do not speak French and rely on Gabriel's English, which makes things a little difficult at times!
GL - Bonjour Geoffrey,
GH - How did the Video Interview between Milo Wolff and I work?
GL - Milo's videos work very well on my Media Player. Glad to see them in WMV. I simply hate Real One Player.
GH - Glad that they worked OK - I think videos are useful on the internet as they obviously have a more human feel, and most people use emotions more than reason to judge things.
GL - Unfortunately the French-English barrier still is quite a problem. I am not a U.S. film nor T. V. fan and I never watch U.S. productions. So Milo Wolff's U.S. accent sounds very odd to my ears. I must hit the repeat button several times to grab some of the words substance. On the other hand those videos are much more revealing than Milo's web pages. I noticed that he is right on many subjects, but many of his assumptions do not match with my own system. As he is 80 (I am 61) I still fear that we will not live long enough to conciliate all this.
GH - We must discuss our ideas soon and see what the three of us agree and disagree on - I learnt a huge amount from Milo Wolff, but we still don't agree on all things (but respect one another nonetheless). It is rare in history for three different people to discover the same thing independently - we must make the most of this and learn from one another. We are each very smart in our own ways.
GL - Your Australian accent sounds much more familiar to my ears. It seems to be a sort of London's echo, and you sure know that we have been invaded by British soldiers here by 1760. This was a very sad year for us Canadians, because Canadians were all French those days. In fact, all the U.S. Mississippi area up to Louisiana between Florida and Texas was French too (the name Louisiana is from Louis XIV of France). Did you ever notice that Détroit, Boston and Chicago were french names too? Now the battle is lost, and all of us will have to be swallowed into an english melting pot very similar to the rest of North America.
GH - I have been to Montreal about ten times over the past 20 years and also a number of times to Quebec city. Thus I am very aware of the French history and fierce resistance to the all pervasive english American culture (or lack of culture!). We in Australia are also being overtaken by American culture. As Leonard Cohen said in a song, America has the best and the worst!
GL - I can write English (hardly) but I just cannot speak it in a reasonable manner, especially while explaining such complex things as matter. So I am afraid that I could not answer your questions as Milo Wolff did. I suppose that I could read a text. I do not know why, but my accent is very different from that of other French Canadians. Maybe because I was a classical course student. But it still is an accent.
GH - Your written English to me is very good. We can film some in English and I can edit out bits where you struggle for words (Milo's video has had heavy editing to cut out any rambling, to keep it short and concise). We can also film a lot in French and use French titles for the questions. I think video on the internet is important, and as data rates become faster, will be more important in the future! And it adds a touch of class to your website! Karene and I have learnt a lot since I filmed and edited Milo so our next videos will be much better!!
GL - I would be very proud to receive you in my pretty house on the riverside. La Rivière des Mille-Iles (thousand islands) is a derivation of the fleuve St-Laurent (St-Lawrence river), about 15 kilometers (10 miles) north of Montréal, which is an island too.
GH - Karene and I will probably be spending about three months a year in Montreal for the next four years as my ex-wife wants to return there to live with our two children. I greatly look forward to meeting you and discussing many things. Thank you for your kindness.
GL - PLEASE examine my two new animations. I made a new one for my moving electron, involving the Doppler effect. I daresay that it is a masterpiece. Starting from now, no scientist can argue against the wave structure of matter any more. IT WORKS.
GH - Your animations are truly remarkable - I have been working very hard on my websites and it gets depressing at times (so much to do!). It lifts my spirits to go to your website and see such beautiful intelligent work on the Wave Structure of Matter. I will soon add some of your diagrams to my web pages and make more of a feature of you and your website. Do you have a biography (English) that explains the history of your ideas and how / when you discovered that matter is a spherical standing wave - this would be useful. I would also like to copy some of your website and put them up on my website and add my comments to it (like I have done with Milo Wolff). My comments would be nice!
While we both know that the Wave Structure of Matter is true (and bloody obvious at that!) - I do not think it will be easily or quickly accepted - I think we are looking at another ten to twenty years of work before it really becomes famous. So you must live a long life like your father! I think I can create (over several years) a website that has pages in the top ten search results for most subjects to do with physics, philosophy and metaphysics - and would then get about 30,000 to 50,000 (perhaps 100,00) page views (hits) a day. I already get about four thousand hits a day and this is after only three months of work! (And most pages are still very incomplete, have no inward links from other websites - which Google requires for higher ranking). My aim is to get my Google page rank up to 8/10 for my main index (currently 5/10), and thus pages coming off the index will have a page rank of 7/10 (currently 4/10). Then I will be able to compete with the big universities for top ten spots, and I am better at optimising my pages than they are so I should win out in the long run! (And Truth eventually wins out!)
Perhaps over time you can help me to build a bigger and better website. The
main thing is to have lots and lots of different pages with different titles,
make sure the pages are well optimised for search engines (I am good at this!)
and have links on every page to every other page with good short descriptions.
The search engines like text in and around links and rank pages higher.
Life is exciting, strange, when one knows reality in a time of ignorance!
From one revolutionary to another, au revoir!
Geoffrey
Au revoir,
Gabriel
GL - Au révolutionnaire Geoffrey,
I am glad that you appreciate my new electron animations. In my judgment they
are marking a decisive step. Nothing else is more important than electrons,
simply because there is nothing else but electrons. This is not a huge effort
of logic and philosophy. Your intelligence is involving electrons. Your thoughts
are electrons. So think about electrons, and you will understand the whole
Universe!
I am especially concerned with science history and I can affirm that a lot of discoveries were made by different people simultaneously. It seems to be a matter of timing. Examples:
Differential calculus : Newton and Leibniz
Doppler effect : Doppler and Fizeau.
Normal distribution : Gauss and Laplace, both working on Poisson's statistics.
Matter contraction : FitzGerald, Larmor and Lorentz.
Relativity : Poincaré and Einstein (however Einstein's theory is obviously a pale copy of Poincaré's ideas)
Radio oscillator, receiver and emitter : Tesla and Marconi.
Telescope meniscus corrector : Maksutov, Bouwers, Penning, Gabor. This case is particularly astounding. Four people not knowing one another, discovering the same thing in four different countries during the same year (1944). A pure insult to statistics! One could add vapour machines, motor cars, planes, etc. Moreover, thousands of patents were claimed by several people from different countries.
I still am doubtful about videos. I am a very good searcher (and a finder), but I am simply null as a speaker. All my life is a suite of communication failures. I am so bad that people would not believe me telling that the orange's colour is orange.
My french website is reaching 1000 hits per week. I made a new page on the Doppler effect recently, and a sub-section (four pages) about optics. Two other pages will follow, about Huygens' principle and Poincaré's local time. So the site is growing rapidly. I am sure that I must try to reach the very few people who can make all the difference. The aim is not to reach the whole Earth population. It appears to be virtually impossible to translate them and keep them all up to date according to my new discoveries. I had new ideas recently. I am seriously damaging my brain cells each morning, drinking plenty of brazilian coffee (great) while watching the plunger ducks on the river and imagining how those damn electrons should behave inside a 'quark'.
I do receive feedback. Mostly students, but sometimes scientists. I recently received a message from a well known nuclear physicist, who admits that the Wave Structure of Matter is coherent. He does not dare to admit it in public, probably because he fears to be ridiculed. Aether's existence is a very touchy subject in the science world. You surely noticed that even Milo Wolff does not dare to admit aether, speaking about 'space'. This hypothesis has been abandoned a long time ago because of Relativity. Abandoned. Not refuted. However, waves do NEED a medium. Speaking about the wave structure of matter without aether is a perfect nonsense. That's it, that's all.
Au plaisir,
Gabriel.
GH - Hi Gab,
I knew about Newton and Leibniz, Einstein and Poincaré, the rest are
interesting.
Keep building new web pages - it is the way to go! Even if most hits are from
the masses and don't lead to anything they GREATLY help your website to get
a higher ranking and thus exposure to more people who do matter!
GL - You surely noticed that even Milo does not dare to admit aether, speaking
about 'space'. This hypothesis has been abandoned a long time ago because of
Relativity. Abandoned. Not refuted. However, waves do NEED a medium. Speaking
about the wave structure of matter without aether is a perfect nonsense.
GH - I absolutely agree - have argued with Milo about this! To me Space and
Ether/Aether are the same thing - wave medium for waves. Do you then consider
space/ether to move/vibrate - that it is Wave MOTION of a nearly rigid Space?
This is important! And that Space is continuous and Infinite - has no parts
/ particles.
I will film you and if you don't like the results I will not use them - OK.
(I am a good film editor, I will make you seem what you are - a highly intelligent
man who has discovered reality!)
It is my birthday today - I am 44. I have known reality now for 7 years. I
think of my life as in two parts, before and after true knowledge of reality!
I first found Milo Wolff 6 years ago, you are my second great discovery! (How
did we find one another? I think Milo sent me an email between the two of you?)
When did you first discover Wave Structure of Matter? How? What is/was your
motivation?
Cosmos,
Geoff
Cher ami,
I found Milo's website in august 2003, searching for other's opinions about matter and waves. Many people are aware that matter is involving waves, but I noticed that Milo was a very special and advanced case. So I sent him a message and he answered very quickly. He was very enthusiastic and he told me that my electron at rest was exactly the same as his electron. Milo sure told you about me in August too.
However he did not approve my moving electron up to now, and you did not either. I am rather sad that both of you do not agree with such an obvious phenomenon. It is a well known fact that the Doppler effect can be applied to plane standing waves, but it is not the case for spherical standing waves. As a matter of fact, I never saw such a demonstration in all my life, and this is why my most recent animation is so important to me. It shows that such a system is POSSIBLE.
I was wondering about gravity by 1975. Mechanics was one of my passions. I soon realised that gravity could not be explained as an attractive force. Something should rather PUSH the Earth toward the Sun, as a shade effect, and it could be caused by particles or waves. Because particles should bounce from the Sun as well as from the Earth, I felt that the final result would be null.
Discussing this with a friend, we both agreed that gravity should be caused by waves. But waves need a medium, and my next step was to examine how the aether should work. I supposed particles bouncing on each other. Now I agree with you - no particles there. But I still do not know how aether works. It could be highly evanescent. Considering an electron, SPACE can be seen as its wavelength and TIME, its frequency. No doubt, the electron is the ultimate clock, and the ultimate ruler.
My mistake about aether particles did show me the correct direction anyway. Because those particles could not let any material object going through them, but only waves, I soon realised that de Broglie could be right much more than he knew himself : matter could be made of waves. Standing waves.
I stopped working and bought my first computer in jan. 1993. I am mainly an optician, and I studied telescopes. I examined the Michelson interferometer with my own programs. Because of my knowledge of standing waves I very quickly noticed that Lorentz was right. I still do not understand why nobody believed him. The Lorentz transformation is so simple, and it explains all.
By 2000 my system was well established since many years, but I was seriously
fearing that such a discovery could be dangerous for mankind. I simply wrote
a book 'Theory of Absolute' explaining the theory, but hiding the facts.
I show in my pages that matter is using much more energy than mc ^ 2 from Einstein's
equation. The electron amplification process indicates that its energy must
be borrowed and then returned to aether waves. This process generates a shade
effect first, and then a radiation pressure which cancels the shade effect.
According to my first approximation one kg of matter is radiating this way
about c ^ 3 Joules per second. This is a huge quantity of energy. It would
not be a good idea to let everybody play with matter.
I waited two years thinking about that. All seemed O. K. and I finally wrote a second book explaining all.
Que sera, sera. Let it be...
Mes amitiés,
Gabriel.
Hi Gabriel,
Thanks for the summary. I would like to use it on my website for some pages that i will put up about you and your discoveries.
> However he did not approve my moving electron up to now, and you did not either. I am rather sad that both of you do not agree with such an obvious phenomenon.
I neither agree nor disagree - I have not studied your ideas enough to understand / know.
Please write to me as soon as you have several days to discuss our work. I will read yours and ask you to read about 60 pages of mine. Then we can see what we agree and disagree on. At the same time I would like to create several web pages of your work and wave diagrams with our comments / discussion included. Is this OK?
Please also reply about MOTION - Do you think Space / Aether is nearly rigid wave-medium for wave motion - that space is moving / vibrating?!
I have had some success making your wave diagrams smaller (took me five hours of playing around!)
Your Huygens Wave Diagram I can re format in Flash and it goes from 93 KBytes down to 38 K Bytes.
You Spherical Standing Wave Diagram I can re format in Flash from 480 K Bytes down to about 30 K Bytes.
I strongly suggest you put up all your pages using Flash movies (you can leave your existing pages up as well). This will decrease the size of your pages from 2,000 K Bytes down to about 250 K Bytes which will greatly help. I can do this for you while I edit the English for you and check that the pages are correct for HTML Validation.
Cosmos,
Geoff
GL - Your way of using a web page in order to explain things appears to be
absolutely terrific.
I will have to think about MOTION, as you repeat that this is important. Aether
could be almost as evanescent as empty space, something between waves and nothing
at all. It sure is nearly rigid and vibrating, thus moving, but this movement
takes place inside less than 10^-18 meters. This is incredibly small and apparently
not significant. However the time is definitely the consequence of this motion.
So we have SPACE and MOTION first, and TIME can be seen as wave motion of space.
This shows that Minkowski's space-time concept is an aberration. Any equation
using this redundant value could never be balanced correctly.
On the contrary your SpaceandMotion.com URL
appears to be highly relevant. From a mechanical point of view, a space and
motion theory could be as important as (and replace) Relativity. I noticed
that inside my moving electron, non concentric waves do not cross themselves
everywhere at the same time, and that this is the cause of the Lorentz transformation.
A SPACE and TIME distortion occurs because of the electron MOTION. Though this
was certainly not your first route, you must be aware that there is a very
interesting development there. Clearly, you are on the right track anyway.
PLEASE recognize that standing waves can become "moving standing waves".
This is a well known fact, not my discovery. Maybe you did not visit Mr. Yuri
Ivanov's site, who also believe in matter waves.
https://www.keelynet.com/spider/b-111e.htm -
His knowledge of Standing Waves is very good.
https://www.keelynet.com/spider/b-104e.htm -
Standing Wave compression vs Lorentz Transformation.
In all my life I never read such intelligent and sparkling stuff. But the result
is so deceiving that I would cry.
I am very happy that you finally expressed your interest for my animations.
This is a great event. I am a bit afflicted that you had to work so hard. If
you intend to do such research and optimizing in the future, I would like to
'help you helping me'.
I noticed that Flash could help in two manners. The first one is the fade in
/ out effect, which allows one to use only three images (positive, neutral
and negative) and still produce a very high quality animation. However this
could be applied only to the spherical standing wave. Perhaps you could use
a blur effect too. Your 39K version obviously uses the high quality 500K images,
and I am curious to know how you did this. My knowledge of electronic images
is very good. Unless you are a sorcerer, you sure used this kind of trick,
and so you cannot use the same one in order to compress the Huygens' animation.
The problem is not related to the system but to the images.
Next, my GIF system does not allow me to re-use the same images on a "round trip" cycle (back and forth sequence). For some of my animations I must repeat the same images for the second part of the cycle (from pi to 2 pi). I suppose that Flash can do that, making the same animation two times smaller for the same quality. Otherwise I prefer quality. I prefer using a large amount of images. Any professional physicist will appreciate this and recognize that these Wave Diagrams are valuable. I prefer not using Flash because this system is far more bulky then animated GIFs. Most people will not know how to deal with it (copy and paste ?), and one must download the program. Maybe I will use it some day, but only if I can significantly reduce the size without reducing the quality.
Cosmos, space and motion.
Gabriel. November 12th, 2003
Help Humanity
"You must be the change you wish to see in the world."
(Mohandas Gandhi)
"When forced to summarize the general theory of relativity in one sentence:
Time and space and gravitation have no separate existence from matter. ... Physical objects are not in space, but these objects are spatially extended. In this way the concept 'empty space' loses its meaning. ... The particle can only appear as a limited region in space in which
the field strength or the energy density are particularly high. ...
The free, unhampered exchange of ideas and scientific conclusions is necessary for the sound development of science, as it is in all spheres
of cultural life. ... We must not conceal from ourselves that no improvement in the present depressing situation is possible without
a severe struggle; for the handful of those who are really determined to do something is minute in comparison with the mass of the lukewarm
and the misguided. ...
Humanity is going to need a substantially new way of thinking if it is to survive!" (Albert Einstein)
We can now deduce the most simple science theory of reality - the wave structure of matter in space. By understanding how we and everything around us are interconnected
in Space we can then deduce solutions to the fundamental problems of human knowledge in physics, philosophy, metaphysics, theology, education, health, evolution and ecology, politics and society.
This is the profound new way of thinking that Einstein
realised, that we exist as spatially extended structures of the universe - the discrete and separate body an illusion. This simply confirms the
intuitions of the ancient philosophers and mystics.
Given the current censorship in physics / philosophy of science journals (based on the standard model of particle physics / big bang cosmology) the internet is the best hope for getting new knowledge
known to the world. But that depends on you, the people who care about science and society, realise the importance of truth and reality.
It is Easy to Help!
Just click on the Social Network links at top of page, or copy a nice image or quote you like and share it. We have a wonderful collection of knowledge from the greatest minds in human history, so people will appreciate your contributions. In doing this you will help a new generation of scientists see that there is a simple sensible explanation of physical reality (One Substance, One Law) - the source of truth and wisdom, the only cure for the madness of man! Thanks! Geoff Haselhurst (Updated May, 2025)
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. (Max Planck, 1920)
"All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing."
(Edmund Burke)
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
(George Orwell)
"Hell is Truth Seen Too Late."
(Thomas Hobbes)
Legal Disclaimer and Privacy Policy
We support 'Fair Use' of these pages for Academic & Non Commercial use.
You are welcome to use images and text, but please reference them with a link to relevant web page on this site. Thanks!
